soxanne beat me to this. Yesterday.
* * * * *
I saw this over at Dr. Mel's blog, where it cracked me up. Go to Google, type in "[your name] needs" and see what you get. Here's what I need (my comments in red):
- Kathy needs to give herself some credit. Okey-doke. "Yay, me!"
- Kathy needs more attention. [/whine]
- Kathy needs to be back on the red carpet. Yes! ::pumps fist::
- Kathy doesn't NEED E! and their Red Carpet. Another country heard from.
- Kathy needs love. We ALL need love.
- Kathy needs a liver and miracle. Ruh-roh...
- Kathy don't [sic] need to be with anyone who looks like he takes more time in a mirror than she does. Hear, hear.
- Kathy needs a Komb. Huh?
- Kathy needs your spooky stories. Hello, blog fodder?
- Kathy needs a lobotomy and therapy. No comment.
Lisa beat me to this. Yesterday.
A day late and a dollar short. Story of my life. ;-)
* * * * *
However, I am (I think) the first to post this quiz.
Name that candybar. (Link fixed.)
I got 4 on the first page and 2 on the second, for a stunningly mediocre score of 25%.
Ha! I did mine and need a psychiatrist and an exorcism!
Posted by: sophanne | 22 February 2009 at 09:25 AM
Your name that candybar link actually says something about a wriggly ranch?
Carrie needs came up with a good home (a pit bull, yay me!), some help and to examine life choices (a 45-yr-old virgin o.0), vitamin water, a nice hot bath, and therapy. Not in that order. What Carrie really needs is a pit bull named Carrie. Who takes hot therapy baths in vitamin water, and is fixed.
Posted by: Carrie | 22 February 2009 at 09:54 AM
I got 8/12, but I contend that I got the first one on the second row right, just due to the fact that what THEY call them are the same as what *I* called them, only their version isn't available in my area.
(Was that vague enough? LOL)
Posted by: Carrie | 22 February 2009 at 11:01 AM
These are fun! I have to go do the 'Jocelyn needs...' now.
You asked about seeing--and judging--my mortifying teaching presentation. Because I'm sure you're not genuinely malevolent, I'll share this link:
http://lsconline.pbwiki.com/FacultyAwards
Of course, my presentation is the one given by Jocelyn.
Thanks for asking!
Posted by: Jocelyn | 22 February 2009 at 11:30 AM
Okay, I'm back: the first one on Google, was "Jocelyn needs to poo."
How'd they know?
Posted by: Jocelyn | 22 February 2009 at 11:31 AM
I'm going crazy here. I just left two comments, and now they aren't showing up. I hope it's just me, being an idiot.
At any rate, I left you the link to the teaching presentation I had to do, so if it doesn't show up in your comments, let me know.
Le sigh.
Posted by: Jocelyn | 22 February 2009 at 11:34 AM
ha ha ha, a lobotomy~!!! We got 8/12 on the first page too... but then totally bombed the second!
Posted by: lisa | 22 February 2009 at 11:48 AM
I clearly eat too much candy (or on the other hand, I examine my food closely before eating?)! 17 total correct. Some of them I've never seen in person, such as the Aero bar. Fun!
Posted by: limedragon :-: Harriet | 22 February 2009 at 01:07 PM
Not going to post my candy bar score. It is embarrassing. I missed most of them. I do not have a cross section to study for very long. I eat them too fast...
Posted by: Sheepish Annie | 22 February 2009 at 04:18 PM
It'd be easier if they should the cross-sections after a bite, rather than a slice.
Posted by: Chris | 22 February 2009 at 08:07 PM
Um, the green candy bar? I'm so not eating that. Toxic looking. I did the Diane needs thing and scored on the first one:
Diane needs a pigfoot and a bottle of beer, some reefer and some gin, and crawlin'
All in one! I didn't think it could get any better than that so I stopped.
Posted by: Diane | 23 February 2009 at 10:39 AM
I did that candy bar thing a while ago and was feeling victorious about my stunningly awesome score until I realized that being able to id candy bars wasn't a skill I should be THAT proud of. Ah well.
Posted by: cursingmama | 23 February 2009 at 10:49 AM
Two of the first three said Cookie needs a new home.
0.o
Posted by: Cookie | 23 February 2009 at 02:54 PM